Yes. And as I was trying to say earlier, there is no law saying that you have to represent the pixels as read, green and blue values for the same location to call the data "a picture" or the format an "image format". The bayer pattern data is just another way to describe an image. You may actually say that it's a different image from the RGB data you might convert it to, because the latter also has some interpolated data - but *of course* the file data represents a picture!

Sure. Without getting too much into the Foveon vs. Bayer debate, it should be noted that the Bayer RAW data doesn't produce a unique RGB image. That's both the advantage and disadvantage of RAW.. more advanced interpolation algorithms could produce better results than others. With RGB in every pixel, it's a lot more defined (once you define what R, G, and B mean in a colorimetric sense)

I, personally, think that the Bayer is a good compromise. It provides luminance information at every pixel location. The chroma is downsampled (2:1 for G, and 4:1 for B and R). Since that's not too far from visual perception, it seems like an acceptable way to go. Now, if the Foveon-type sensor could have good color rendition with the same number of sensor sites, then it would be a lot more competitive.

And like I said, more or less, if Pentax had bothered, they might have tried to introduce an extension to the TIFF format allowing the colour model to be set to, "bayer pattern data" or whatever, and perhaps rules for transformation to RGB to be stored as TIFF tags...

I think they sorta did that. The TIFF has a number of funky tags in it. Some are obviously proprietary.

But we're discussing minor details here, of course, I must have little to do these days... Yep, I have, come to think of it; I'm on sick leave as a result of the fact that I tried something called "sports" last week...

- Toralf

LOL... I've got so much to do these days, I can't do anything. Getting ready to fly my airplane to Alaska and try to wear out my -DS... :)

-Cory

--

*************************************************************************
* Cory Papenfuss                                                        *
* Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student               *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University                   *
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to