Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 18:34, Cotty wrote: >> On 17/6/05, Joaquim Carvalho, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >> >Is there a CCD or that can do something like this? >> >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/images/mlu1.jpg >> >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/images/mlu2.jpg > >Picture2 is 363 noisy but good pixels wide >Horizontally it's an 1/80 crop of Picture1 >363*80=29040 (H) >29040/1.3=22338 (V) > >The original image is at least 29040x22338 noisy but good pixels in size >or 648 Mega pixels (close to 645 but I guess this must is a coincidence) >Who has a CCD like this? Nasa?
If you try to compare film and digital by counting pixels, you have a life of confusion and misery ahead of you. This application of information theory forms the best basis for comparison I've seen yet: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dq.shtml -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
