LOL
On 6/20/05, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No,no,no.. you got it wrong, I believe:
> Making the photographs look sharp - doesn't mean they have been sharpened in
> PS. Not at all.
>
> If I get dressed up in my white linen trousers, matching jacket, shirt and
> tie, with polished Bubetti shoes - I look sharp - at least someone told me
> once :-)
>
> Sharp means (here) elegant, posh, great, stylish etc.
> Regards
>
> Jens Bladt
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
>
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sendt: 18. juni 2005 18:02
> Til: [email protected]
> Emne: Re: Are your photos too good?
>
>
> Or one that's in focus, not taken with a Point and Shoot. Under those
> terms Frank's work is fair game.
>
> Steve Jolly wrote:
>
> > David Mann wrote:
> >
> >>
> http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=528&e=1&u=/ap/20050617/ap_on_hi_te
> /photo_printing_frustration
> >
> >
> > I particularly like the implication that a "professional" photograph
> > is one that has been sharpened in Photoshop...
> >
> > S
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
> --Groucho Marx
>
>
>
