Hi Paul ... either you missed my second post or it's not made it to the list. I missed the "FA" in your subject line. I had the A*200/4.0, not the FA.
The A* was OK, but it didn't live up to its great reputation. I much preferred the A100/2.8 wrt sharpness, and it was easier to use for my purposes as well. As a parenthetical aside, and FWIW, there are, imo, a few A* lenses that are fine, but not the superb optics one might expect. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Paul Stenquist > Thanks Shel. That's about what I was guessing. It's a super lens, based > on what I've seen. Did you like it? > On Jul 9, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Hi Paul ... > > > > I recently sold one of mine for $950.00.
