it's a sign that either Pentax wanted terms that Sony didn't like, that Sony
found more willing support in KM, or that Sony was never interested in
Pentax.
Herb....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
Couldn't that be a sign of strenght on Pentax behalf?
I don't think Sony need to go in cahoots with KM if they were that strong
or had that strong potential in the DSLR market. Likewise, I don't think
the merging of Konica and Minolta was due to the strenght of Minolta....
