Yep, yep, yep....
If anyone else had posted that, I might have figured that I was mistaken. But
since you went off like clockwork, it just prooves my point. Only 5% difference
and that only has to do with the hardware, you say????
To bad you can't read english!
Why is it when I say something simply you have to prove I am wrong by saying the
same thing in a long winded manner. I had a Math teacher just like you, "Yes
you can do it in 3 steps that way, but I want you do it this way (spends 15 minutes
scribling on the blackboard outlining the problem in 27 steps). The only real
difference between you and he is I can safely say, I think you are full of shit.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 30, 2005, at 9:14 AM, Graywolf wrote:
Maybe it needs to be mentioned here. Photoshop for Windows, and
Photoshop for Mac X are actually two entirely different programs. Yes
they do have a very similar interface and many of the techniques used
on one work fine on the other. But in other ways trying to treat them
as the same program will lead to utter confusion, especially with
regard to how they us the hardware they are loaded on.
Sorry Graywolf, but that's absolutely incorrect. There are detail
differences in the user interface and the low level interfaces to the
OS graphics systems and memory management functions, but the core and
Photoshop application binaries are built at Adobe from at least 95%
identical source files.
I worked with these teams at Adobe quite a bit, personally, when I was
involved with Apple's development tools engineering group.
Godfrey
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/85 - Release Date: 8/30/2005
