And also are you trying to say the sensor is revealing the lens to not actually be as good as reviewed or are you saying the sensor is inferior to film with regards to the range of optical designs it can handle without sensor induced artifacts?
I could see where one lens could be superior on digital and inferior on film AND another design could be superior on film but inferior on digital because the current digital is not as good as film for resolution so a lower resolution lens specifically optimized for digital might outperform ON DIGITAL a film design lens which is optically much better on film but not optimized for digital sensors limitations. (sounds confusing?) jco -----Original Message----- From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 8:41 PM To: Herb Chong Subject: Re: Pentax K 2.5/200mm > i find 6MP plenty good enough to show that many of the highly regarded > Pentax lenses on film bodies are inadequate for use on the *istD. Which ones, Herb? Thanks. Fred
