lenses which were adequate or better on film turned out to be inadequate on
digital. they generally were not sharp enough for me to continue using,
although in the case of the FA* 24/2, the chromatic aberration got way out
of hand on digital. top quality lenses when used on film generally remained
top quality on the *istD. many that were very good became acceptable or
worse. some stayed acceptable. none ever got better. i got rid of any lenses
that had too much difference between center and corner sharpness. also sold
ones that showed too much falloff wide open too.
Herb....
----- Original Message -----
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: Pentax K 2.5/200mm
And also are you trying to say the sensor is revealing
the lens to not actually be as good as reviewed or are you
saying the sensor is inferior to film with regards to
the range of optical designs it can handle without sensor
induced artifacts?
