Hi,
Upon further reflection, and upon reading the responses to my previous post, I
must agree with those who state that the original feedback should remain, with a
further amendment that the situation has been resolved.
I agree for the reasons stated by those other posters, along with the reality
that the negative feedback may well have been part of the reason that the vendor
changed his original position that a refund was not warranted. So, it really
should remain there, as an indication that the transaction was something less
than a smooth one.
Of course, it's up to Albano how he wishes to handle it, isn't it.
regards,
frank
CW wrote:
> Good point. However I feel that the negative feedback was warranted and
> should remain. It would be good if it could be amended to show the eventual
> satisfactory (we hope) resolution, it should remain noted that there was a
> big hassle involved. The whole point of the feedback system is to let
> prospective buyers know about possible pitfalls.
> MNSHO
>
> Cory Waters
> Atlanta, GA USA
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
