So I guess you feel that's what Nikon is saying with their 12mp APS-C
digital?
Tom C wrote:
I guess that sort of sums my feelings. I agree with Paul that I
haven't found 6 MP inadequate, but then what have I to compare it to?
Suppose we took a photo and wanted to crop it by some factor for
display or printing. Assuredly a 12, 16 etc., megapixel camera will
allow this to be done with a higher degree of (dare I say resolution)
quality, than a 10MP camera, or than a 6MP camera.
Not preaching to the choir, I know we all know this.
So basically if Pentax comes out with a 10MP APS-C DSLR as their
flagship they will be saying in the eyes of most of the world, "we are
not even attempting to stay up with our competitors when it comes to
non-MF DSLR's".
It may be a good camera, it may produce excellent results, but in the
eyes of comparison shoppers and in the eyes of professionals who buy
their equipment to make a living, it will be lacking.
Tom C.
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:28:14 +1000
This one time, at band camp, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Uh, the rest of the world isn't using 12-17. Only a very few, and
> they're spending upward of 5K to do so. Ten megapixels is 67% more
than
> six, and six has proved quite adequate for all my needs. I look
forward
> to ten and will be buying on day one.
Yes, its a good start, but still lands Pentax in second/third place to
the others. I guess Pentax has dug themselves into APS sensor and I will
have to wait and see if the 645D comes to being.
Kind regards
Kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
