Thanks all, time to start saving my pennies. ;-) I've been looking (drooling) at the 24-90, it's hard to justify the cost because the range overlaps several of my other 'better' lenses. And I really hate losing the extra stop at the long end. But I keep hearing such good things about it maybe it's time to give it try.
How does the 28-105/3.2-4.5 stack up against the A35-105? Has anyone had the opportunity to compare the two directly? Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 9:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Challenge my zoom! > > > Yes. The 24-90. > > Rick > > --- Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd really like to replace my A35-105/3.5 with > > something > > smaller and lighter, maybe even AF. > > So I go take a couple of sample pics with the D to > > show > > on eekBay. > > Then I can make the big bucks! > > Problem is that the sample pics are so good I change > > my mind again. > > Does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement for > > this very large, heavy, positively _gorgeous_ lens? > > > > Here's a sampe full frame and 100% crop: > > > > http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/7757.htm > > > > ist-D at 1/125th and 105mm at f:5.6, ISO 400. > > From .JPG's. > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com >
