[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Yesterday's Amateur Photographer magazine contained an ill-informed review of the MZ-S, in which almost all of the reviewer's complaints could be attributed to having not read the manual properly, or having not taken the trouble to learn how to use the camera. >> Perhaps Pentax doesn't place enough advertising with the magazine to warrant a review by somebody who can read a manual. I'd say this is a serious mistake. Regards, Bob S. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Bucky
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Bucky
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... Doug Franklin
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photograph... Peter Alling
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (... Jim Moniz
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Tom Rittenhouse
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK revi... Rob Brigham
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK revi... Rfsindg
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK revi... Jim Brooks
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK revi... Cotty
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (firs... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Digital (was Re: MZ-S review in Amate... Doctor Digi
- Re: Digital (was Re: MZ-S review in Amate... Mark D.
- Digital weddings - or why I want a full-f... John Mustarde
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK revi... Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK revi... Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski

