Cotty, Not printing much here. I've got an old Epson 870 Photo printer. It seems to work OK for up to 8x10's, but WYSIWYG is still a challenge. There are monitor colors, printer colors, and paper rendering colors. (Plus the incandescent lights by my basement desktop setup...) If I want something more serious, I try my local photo store. We'll see how they do.
I suppose I should be printing more, but then the temptation to fiddle with the process would be irresistable. I Do Not need more time in front of a computer screen! Regards, Bob S. On 11/28/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 28/11/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >My understanding is that RAW gives you more shades of colors in > >eachpixel and more opportunity to adjust colors in post production, > >butjpeg or RAW, you still have 6 million pixels to work with...no > >more,no less. So I look on RAW as just a way to get better post > >processedimages, not anything to improve resolution. > > Bob, with the Pentax, you'll get slightly better resolution with RAW as > well. But if you're viewing your pics on a monitor and emailing family > and friends, jpegs are plenty. Do you print any? > > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > >
