Cotty wrote: > > > > The reason I shoot jpegs is simple. I shot the same scene RAW and large/ > fine jpeg. I put both through PS and printed each at A3. I compared the > prints and there was not a damn bit of difference between them. My end > result is printing, so that was that. > > If I were shooting for a magazine I'd undoubtedly shoot RAW. I'm not! > > The camera does a great job of exposure and if the jpeg is that bad I'll > pass. Besides, I like contrasty lighting setups ;-) > > > > >You continue shooting jpegs, I'll continue shooting raw. That way we > >will both be happy <grin>. > > Hey I'll drink to that good buddy :-) > > Cheers, > Cotty > I'll continue to shoot jpgs, too - hey, Cotty, this is an area we sure do agree on. I can shoot raw, but I can't get enough images on a card - and I have to take time to run it through a coverter to tif and it takes too much room on my old computer etc
someone said earlier on the list that if you nailed the shot there was essentially no difference. glad to see you confirm that. annsan
