On 1/12/05, Cory Papenfuss, discombobulated, unleashed: > I disagree on this one. The difference is that with a JPG >workflow, you have to do the tweaking at the time you take the picture. >If you take the time to do white balancing, saturation/sharpness >adjustment, etc at the time of the shot, that constipates workflow too.
I don't do a thing in the camera. I used to set the white balance manually, but the auto white balance is so good i have yet to fault it. My sharpening in camera is set to nominal (that is, half-way, and back a bit ;-) everything else is set to between fair and middling. The only real advantage for me is that i can get 346 jpegs on a 2 GB card instead of 188 RAWs (at 320 ISO). Daft, I know ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
