Paul, Since the ultimate output of most photography is a print (arguable), it seems to me the comparison should be on paper.
Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Pentax RAW vs JPEG Shootout (was - Re: Why I Haven't Yet Switched) Hi Rob, I think Cotty agreed that RAW allows for more latitude. What he wanted me to test was my assertion (based on Adobe info) that upsizing in the RAW converter yields better results than subsequent PhotoShop interpolation. I'm not sure if one can see the difference, but I'll have a look. I think a 100% monitor viewing of the interpolated images is probably just as good as a print for this purpose. On Dec 2, 2005, at 7:05 AM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 2 Dec 2005 at 10:50, Toralf Lund wrote: > >> Will he do a proper blind test while looking at those pictures, I >> wonder... > > All that is needed is two prints one with an A and one with a B on the > back. > However a test like this means little if the RAW file used for > comparison > hasn't been processed in order to optimise the image or if the scene is > comfortably accommodated in the latitude of the JPEG image or if the > printer > isn't calibrated to reproduce the whole data range that it's fed. > > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
