[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/2005 7:30:20 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be true if we were judging jpeg results vs. RAW results. What
Cotty disputed was Adobe's assertion that the RAW converter provides better
upsizing than does PhotoShop interpolation. Evaluation of an interpolation is
probably best done on the screen. I don't think there's much dispute regarding the
difference between jpeg results and RAW results. It's a matter of range and
contrast control. It's obvious in some cases and indistinguishable in others.
Paul
======
Okay, I am clueless. Why would one upsize a RAW during conversion? They are
already big files. I am missing something...
Marnie aka Doe And, uh, by upsizing do you mean making larger?
extra resolution to make better large prints.
-Adam
