I'm just curious, why do you all keep going around and around about what makes a camera a "professional" model, complaining about they myriad of features on different models and brands and their implementation, instead of just accepting what's available, deciding what it is in the way of features and design that you prefer or need, and buy that camera and use it? Please help me understand this idea that more features and faster this and quicker that equals "professional". -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It matters little how much equipment we use; it matters much that we be masters of all we do use." - Sam Abell - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- RE: Professional petit miam
- RE: Professional Peter Alling
- Re: Professional Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Professional Robert Harris
- Re: Professional dave o'brien
- RE: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review John Francis
- RE: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review John Francis
- RE: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Rob Brigham
- RE: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski
- Re: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Alan Chan
- Re: Professional Cameras or Professional Complain... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Professional Cameras or Professional Comp... Bill Owens
- Re: Professional Cameras or Professional ... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Professional Cameras or Professional Comp... Ken Archer
- Re: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Alan Chan
- RE: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Alan Chan
- RE: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Alan Chan
- Re: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Norman Baugher
- Re: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S review Chris Brogden
- Re: More RE: Amateur Photographer MZ-S re... Peter Alling

