I never said it wasn't, just implied that you shouldn't expect justice from the law.

Jack Davis wrote:

US justice system is far from perfect, it's only the best one in the
world.

Jack

--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I don't know about that, I expect that real justice is a likely
either way. Juries can be capricious, so can judges. The system doesn't even try to guarantee justice by the way, only process.

Tom C wrote:

Don't think my earlier comments meant I have faith in the justice system(s). It's just that one probably stands a better chance of justice (statistically) if their case is heard by a jury than by a judge, or any other single person.

Tom C.




From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:46:58 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

and when you castrate an innocent person, how will you put his
balls
back on?
Someone proven by the courts to be guilty is likely to be
guilty.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/uk/2001/life_of_crime/misca
rriages.stm

I'm happy with the risk he might be innocent. Balls away!
...until it's you, or your son, presumably.

Bob


--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com



--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).

Reply via email to