Should have done a blind test. It appears to me the second image is noticeably softer. Is it unacceptable? Probable not. It might be if the subject was closer.
Thanks for the demo Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- >From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Continuing to Accessorize Bertha > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "jtainter" >Subject: Continuing to Accessorize Bertha > > >>I have been wondering whether it would be a good idea to get the A 2X-L >>converter to go with my F* 600 F4. It's an expensive pup, and doesn't often >>come up used. For photographing small birds, though, even 600 mm often >>isn't enough. > >These two pictures were shot within moments of each other, the top one with >no teleconverter, the bottom one using the 2X-L converter, on the istD. >http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/oddends/600mm_teleconverter_comparison.html >These are no crops of the frame, merely resized and slightly sharpened for >the web. > >William Robb > > ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
