Leon Altoff wrote on 16.02.06 12:32: > I had to go looking for my 28-70 f4 just for comparison. There is a bit > of wobble on the D FA 50, but it's nothing compared to the 28-70 (which > I think is a good lens for the price). I haven't me an autofocus lens > that has no wobble at all. Thanks. So it seems first impression of DFA is rather bad because it is small and made mainly from plastic? But if it would be all metal it would be much heavier. Right now it is the smallest and the lightest 100/2.8 macro on the market!
> If we are looking only of barrel wobbliness at full extension the 50 is > about the same as my FA100 2.8 macro. Now I know what you mean as I once had FA 100/2.8 macro :-) Thanks again for info! -- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
