But Shel, I =am= an LX user. I even appreciate it for what it is. I just don't let it
define me.
Todd did make a strong case against adding features to the LX. And he managed to do it
without once calling anyone a techno-weenie.
Doug
At 10:10 PM -07007/30/01, Shel Belinkoff wrote, or at least typed:
>It doesn't bother me Doug, it's just that adding all that stuff to an
>LX makes it - well, not an LX. I think Todd echoes my sentiments
>pretty well.
>
>I'm not telling anyone what to use, nor am I suggesting that cameras
>with a multitude of features, levers, buttons, dials, and screens are
>unacceptable. But to suggest that bastardizing an LX with all that
>stuff still leaves one with an LX is, well, ridiculous. The LX is
>what it is.
>
>It seems that I stuck a nerve, Doug ... perhaps deep down you're a
>repressed LX user hiding behind an autofocus facade <GD&R>
>--
>Shel Belinkoff
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"Why should I use a meter? What if the darn thing broke on me
>when I was out making a photograph? Then what would I do?"
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
