Shel wrote: > It doesn't bother me Doug, it's just that adding all that stuff to an > LX makes it - well, not an LX. A clue to what could be done is to look at what Pentax did to the 67 to turn it into the 67II. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- LX with AF, realy it works ! george de fockert
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Jim Apilado
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Doug Brewer
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Todd Stanley
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Steve Larson
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! P�l Jensen
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Doug Brewer
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Shel Belinkoff
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! P�l Jensen
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Doug Brewer
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Doug Brewer
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! P�l Jensen
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! Alin Flaider
- Re: LX with AF, realy it works ! P�l Jensen
- Re[2]: LX with AF, realy it works ! Bob Walkden
- Re: Re[2]: LX with AF, realy it works ! Chris Brogden
- Re: Re[2]: LX with AF, realy it works ! Bucky
- Re: Re[2]: LX with AF, realy it wo... Chris Brogden

