It's evidence of intelligent design because it tends to point in that direction. It doesn't prove anything of course. But it suggests that the concept should be explored further. Evolution is sound science, and it's foolish to deny that. But evolution doesn't preclude other possibilities that should be open to investigation. To do that is equally foolish. However, I think that political correctness precludes other possibilities for many. It's currently not popular to consider concepts we can't quantify and classify.frank theriault wrote:And, just because the conditions for life and it's continuance are so amazing, why is that evidence of intelligent design?
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Tom C
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy John Francis
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Tom C
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy frank theriault
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Keith McGuinness
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Mishka
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Keith McGuinness
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy keith_w
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Keith McGuinness
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Kenneth Waller
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Paul Stenquist
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy frank theriault
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Gonz
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Tom C
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy frank theriault
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Gonz
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy graywolf
- RE: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Malcolm Smith
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy E.R.N. Reed
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy keith_w
- Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy Cotty

