I'd agree with that. My experience is biased towards motorsports, which gets very little US newspaper coverage if it isn't NASCAR, so I see more of the magazine shooters than those from newspapers.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:24:48PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote: > From my experience in various press venues, I'd say that magazine > photographers shoot RAW, newspaper photographers shoot jpeg. > Paul > On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:24 PM, John Francis wrote: > > >On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:37:04AM -0800, David wrote: > >>I mostly shoot action (cycling, Cyclocross in particular), here's my > >>humble thoughts. > > > > . . . . > > > >>3) Find me one action photographer that wastes his space with raw > >>files. They require lots of extra time to process. Most action > >>photographers I know shoot action with jpg. > > > >This s the one point where I would disagree with you. Almost all the > >action photographers I know from my times in the media room at motor > >races shoot RAW. Who do you think is buying those 12GB CF cards? > >
