Nenad Djurdjevic wrote: > (Never owned an LX). Forgive me if I've got the wrong person, but wasn't it you who posted that long message about how the LX could be improved by the addition of autofocus, metering changes, built-in winder, etc. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Why should I use a meter? What if the darn thing broke on me when I was out making a photograph? Then what would I do?" - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Paul Jones
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Nenad Djurdjevic
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Nicholas Wright
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Paul Jones
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus P�l Jensen
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Eric Lawton
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Jeff Eikenberry
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Pentxuser
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus P�l Jensen
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Jostein �ksne
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Pentxuser
- Re: Pentax's Amatuer MZ-S and LX Autofocus Pentxuser

