I've been very conflicted with regards to the Adobe DNG "universal RAW
format". I've always liked a lot about it and after reading Bruce
Fraser's "Camera RAW for the Real World" I *really* like it and want
to adopt it for all my archiving. But I hate to lose the EXIF
information that it throws away, specifically the information on the
lens used for each shot.

So I was recently delighted to notice that if I use Camera RAW to
convert PEF image into a JPEG in Photoshop, the resulting JPEG
contains all the original EXIF data, including lens type. And CAMERA
RAW will do batch conversions. Hooray! Problem solved! I just batch
convert to small, low quality JPEGS and I've got ready-made thumbnails
with all my EXIF data! Then I can run the DNG batch converter and
ditch the PEF files. But noooooo... If you *batch* convert with Camera
RAW it seems you don't get the lens type EXIF data that's retained
when you convert one at a time. <Insert sound of head being smacked
repeatedly against a wall.>

Then I thought of having a look at the Pentax Browser to see if it
might batch convert to JPEG thumbnails, assuming that *it* would
retain all the EXIF data. Got something even better: Pentax Browser
will export just the EXIF data from all the images and put it into a
comma-delimited text file! Yes, it will also do the
small-JPEG-conversion-while-retaining-EXIF that I had hoped for, but
saving just the text data is vastly quicker and results in much less
extra data to store.

Now what I really don't need is for someone to explain to me a much
simpler way I could have been doing this all along...
;-)
 

Reply via email to