> > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/03/17 Fri PM 12:52:08 GMT > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Re: OT 4 months.... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mike wilson" > Subject: Re: Re: OT 4 months.... > > > > > > > Why does there need to be a fisheye effect? > > http://www.dvdtechcameras.com/gallery/zenitar/1/14.htm > > > > > Not every picture can be so carefully contrived as to hide the lens > curvature as some of the ones in that gallery. > > William Robb
Good exercise trying, though. 8-) I was very impressed by the gallery, for that reason. If I didn't know that they were from a fisheye (albeit one cropping to the centre of the fov) I would be very hard pressed to tell them apart from a "normal" wideangle. m ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
