On Mar 20, 2006, at 8:06 PM, Adam Maas wrote:

Why? If you don't do AF, the AF system is irrelevant to you (Although I generally find the focus rings to be better damped on USM-type lenses tan most screw-drive lenses).
Adam, you should try Ltd and FA* lenses then. They usually have focussing rings at least as well damped as the ones in ring-USM driven lenses.

And USM is a win for AF users, with faster focus and less hunting.

I won't agree about hunting - this factor depends more on in camera AF logic - if you compare two similar lenses in Nikon mount - one with SWM (Nikon's name for ultrasonic motors) motor and second one with classic, scredriven AF, there will be no difference in hunting. In all other factors I agree with you and would add quietness and FTM (the latter thing we already have in DA and DFA lenses despite classic AF). All in all Pentax needs to make this move as it is now the only camera company with DSLRs that doesn't have USM driven lenses. Right now even Olympus got in-lens AF motors, of ultrasonic type in new Sigmas for 4/3.



--
Best regards
Sylwek


Reply via email to