On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > It wasn't a test, so it wasn't repeated. Al I'm saying is that the LX > with > it's OTF metering worked better than expected and gave 36 perfectly > exposed > negatives in very low and changing light. > > I said nothing about saturated negs - I said that they were perfectly > exposed.
Right, Shel, and what I'm saying is that you were hitting the exposure wall on the film anyways at that kind of exposure length -- basically, that your experience is actually what you should expect to happen with any camera with exposures of that length, even if they vary in length. That's what I meant by a saturated neg -- not that it's overexposed, just that it's taken all it can because of the exposure length. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
