And what were they? The article is very vague. -Aaron
-----Original Message----- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Talk about crap Date: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:33 pm Size: 1K To: pdml@pdml.net I saw him on televison Aaron. The claims came from his own mouth. He was not teaching the class how to discern truth from falsehood. Tom C. >From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Talk about crap >Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:55:20 -0400 > > >On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote: > > > I don't feel that my academic freedom would be infringed in the > > least if he got the boot. > >Keith, you wouldn't feel that your academic freedom would be infringed >if a professor were booted without an examination of the material or >even a single person knowing what his claims actually are? Just based >on a single line in a newspaper article describing what we can only >assume is the most sensational part of his intended lecture, and >without context? > >What if he's presenting it to be debunked by the class as an exercise >but loses his job on the strength of this newspaper article -- would >you still feel that your academic freedom had not been infringed then? > >What I've been trying to say (and for some reason this got me labeled >as a 9/11 Denier) is that someone should, you know, find out what he's >actually saying before the man is condemned for saying it. > >-Aaron > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
