Come on folks - it's not that hard. What makes the 67 superior to almost ANY digital camera - except for resolution? The K10D closes this gap. And - yes - I believe I did guess Aarons secret. Jens
Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af John Francis Sendt: 17. august 2006 18:15 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote: > Raw rules! > > But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement > compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera" as an > option. PEF, of course, already includes a full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera". Unfortunately it's done at the lowest JPEG quality, so it's not useful for much more than the preview (in-camera on the LCD, and also in the Pentax Photo Browser) for which it was presumably included. I've long wanted control over the quality of that JPEG - if I'm shooting raw I'm not going to complain about the difference between a 3MB JPEG that's quite usable for many purposes and a 1.5MB JPEG of no use to me. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
