Jens, If it was merely resolution, why the heck would Aaron be looking at the K10D instead of a higher-resolution body from Nikon or Canon (Or a Hasselblad or other MF body with a digiback).
Aaron specifically said it was something _no_ other DSLR offered yet. And between the D2x, 5D, 1Ds mkII and Mamiya ZD, there are plenty of options which handily outperform the upcoming K10D for resolution. And there are 3 other cameras on the market (or will be before the K10D) which match the K10D for resolution (A100, D80 and Digital Module R). And also its something he can't talk about, the resolution of the K10D was practically the first thing we knew about it. -Adam Jens Bladt wrote: > Come on folks - it's not that hard. What makes the 67 superior to almost ANY > digital camera - except for resolution? > The K10D closes this gap. > And - yes - I believe I did guess Aarons secret. > Jens > > Jens Bladt > http://www.jensbladt.dk > +45 56 63 77 11 > +45 23 43 85 77 > Skype: jensbladt248 > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af John > Francis > Sendt: 17. august 2006 18:15 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote: > >>Raw rules! >> >>But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement >>compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera" as an >>option. > > > PEF, of course, already includes a full sized embedded JPEG "in-camera". > Unfortunately it's done at the lowest JPEG quality, so it's not useful > for much more than the preview (in-camera on the LCD, and also in the > Pentax Photo Browser) for which it was presumably included. > > I've long wanted control over the quality of that JPEG - if I'm shooting > raw I'm not going to complain about the difference between a 3MB JPEG > that's quite usable for many purposes and a 1.5MB JPEG of no use to me. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 08/16/2006 > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
