That's amazingly good detail. Jens Bladt wrote:
>Good answer, Jack. >I guess the answer will depend on K10D image samples as well. >Have any of you seen image samples from the competing 10MP DSLRs - Canon >D400? > >Thsi is a D80sample. Looks pretty good to me. Onlu very fod cameras will >render eye lashes this detailed, right:(Warning Large File) >http://www.nikonimaging.com/global/products/digitalcamera/slr/d80/img/pic_00 >2b.jpg > >Regards > >Jens Bladt >http://www.jensbladt.dk >+45 56 63 77 11 >+45 23 43 85 77 >Skype: jensbladt248 > >-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jack >Davis >Sendt: 20. september 2006 16:45 >Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Emne: RE: K10D vs. Medium Format > > >Jens, >You're asking this question for more people than you know. I have major >interest in the answer. One that we'll probably each have to answer on >our own. > >Jack > >--- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Lucas wrote: >> >> >>>The rock-bottom prices for great analogue camera's help as well: I >>> >>> >>can >>afford >> >> >>>more and better gear. >>> >>> >>True - but I already have (some) great analog cameras. >>Basaically I was just rambling abuot financing a K10D by selling my >>6x6 >>gear. >>I really dont miss shooting a lot of film, but I kept my 6x6 outfit >>because >>I have -until now- been able to convince myself, that the 6x6 image >>quality >>is superior to any Pentax DSLR. This "truth" is probably comming to >>an >>nd - with the K10D or the digital Pentax 645. Or is it? >>Regards >>Jens Bladt >>http://www.jensbladt.dk >>+45 56 63 77 11 >>+45 23 43 85 77 >>Skype: jensbladt248 >> >>-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >>Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af >>Lucas >>Rijnders >>Sendt: 20. september 2006 09:16 >>Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Emne: Re: K10D vs. Medium Format >> >> >>Op Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:56:41 +0200 schreef Jens Bladt >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >>>I am considering selling my MF ( 6x6) gear to help finance the >>> >>> >>K10D. >> >> >>>Does the new 10MP camera with 22 bit colour depth mean it's time to >>> >>> >>ditch >> >> >>>the 120-roll film equipment? >>>Can I get the same image quality and resolution with the K10D? >>> >>> >>Isn't that hard to tell without K10D examples? Or did I miss them? >> >> >> >>>PS: >>>I three years time the K10D will have lost as much value (close to >>> >>> >>all of >> >> >>>it) as I have saved (cost of 120 film, development etc.) - during >>> >>> >>the >> >> >>>same >>>period of time. >>>I other words - there's really no economical gain in switching to >>>digital - >>>over a relative short period of time. Over a longer period there >>> >>> >>isn't >> >> >>>either - because digital cameras get obsolete in 3-4 years >>> >>> >>Eventually >> >> >>>I'll >>>buy a new camera more often, than I had to, using film (film >>> >>> >>cameras >> >> >>>lasted >>>10-20 years) In other words -it's not an economical qestion. It's a >>>question >>>of image quality today. Not considering that film/developing >>> >>> >>options may >> >> >>>disappear anytime soon. >>> >>> >>This has been true for me since I stopped printing all negatives. The >>rock-bottom prices for great analogue camera's help as well: I can >>afford >>more and better gear. Which does not really help with photography, >>but is >>fun :o) >>-- >>Regards, Lucas >>(still eagerly awaiting the 645) >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: >>09/19/2006 >> >>-- >>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: >>09/19/2006 >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 09/19/2006 > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 09/19/2006 > > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
