I wasn't sure about that, but I believe that's a considerably larger lens. Granted, I would prefer one on the 60-250 as well. On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:47 PM, David Savage wrote:
> Errr...my FA* 80-200mm f2.8 has one. > > Dave > > At 08:39 AM 21/09/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> They don't appear large enough to require a tripod mount, certainly >> not the 50-135. And I don't think Pentax has ever used a tripod mount >> on a lens shorter than 300mm. >> Paul >> On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:35 PM, David Savage wrote: >> >>> At 07:00 AM 21/09/2006, Lawrence Kwan wrote: >>>> 3 New DA* lenses announced: >>>> >>>> http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2006/200646.html >>>> http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg >>>> >>>> PENTAX-DA* 16-50mm F2.8ED AL[IF] >>>> PENTAX-DA* 50-135mm F2.8ED [IF] >>>> PENTAX-DA* 60-250mm F4ED [IF] >>>> >>>> Available in March 2007 >>> >>> So where is the tripod mound on the 50-135 & 60-250? >>> >>> Are they removable of are we just [EMAIL PROTECTED] outa' luck? >>> >>> Dave > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
