Yes, I'll concede that. But with IS, I suspect that i'll use it almost exclusively hand held. But you're right, a tripod collar would be desirable here. Paul On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
> Yep. But in digital age 300mm is 200mm. (Before somebody snaps at > me; I know > this is not correct, strictly speaking). > So according to this logic the longest lens should have tripod collar. > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Paul > Stenquist > Sent: 21. september 2006 02:39 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: 3 New DA* USM lenses > > They don't appear large enough to require a tripod mount, certainly > not the 50-135. And I don't think Pentax has ever used a tripod mount > on a lens shorter than 300mm. > Paul > On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:35 PM, David Savage wrote: > >> At 07:00 AM 21/09/2006, Lawrence Kwan wrote: >>> 3 New DA* lenses announced: >>> >>> http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2006/200646.html >>> http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg >>> >>> PENTAX-DA* 16-50mm F2.8ED AL[IF] >>> PENTAX-DA* 50-135mm F2.8ED [IF] >>> PENTAX-DA* 60-250mm F4ED [IF] >>> >>> Available in March 2007 >> >> So where is the tripod mound on the 50-135 & 60-250? >> >> Are they removable of are we just [EMAIL PROTECTED] outa' luck? >> >> Dave >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
