Not true. > > From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/09/26 Tue AM 01:03:05 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: What I'd LIke to See instead of Crap Features > > Opening the original un-edited RAW file in PS, the only limit to the > options you have, is your imagination & proficiency with the software. > > Dave > > > At 08:27 AM 26/09/2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >I don't see it as imposing limits, but expanding options. > > > >Shel > > > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > > Date: 9/25/2006 5:09:22 PM > > > Subject: Re: What I'd LIke to See instead of Crap Features > > > > > > I certainly wouldn't want anything that introduced grain. In terms of > > > gray scale values and response, I'm not interested in duplicating > > > what film could or could not do. I would rather just experiment with > > > the full potential of the RAW information. To my mind, anything else > > > would merely impose limits. > > > Paul > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
