On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, K.Takeshita wrote: > Now, they said their concern was on "Alkaline" which indicates that NiMH > might do, but considering that the whole purpose of going for AA's was the > wide availability of non-rechargeable batteries, I can understand why Pentax > played safe on this.
The existence of Lithium AAs blows away their theory. Cheap, light, durable, easy-care (actually non-care), with half a decade of shelf-life. The fact that I can swap the flash batteries with grip bateries and keep on shooting is what counts for me. And not a bloody charger in sight. Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
