He probably can. This report is one little blip on the radar that contains little information with regard to WHY.
They beat their forecasts. Forecasts that they had earlier revised downwards. They had a return to profitability. That's good. Because of camera sales alone, or because of a number of factors including internal cost-cutting measures? Tom C. >From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Bad news >Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:43:00 -0500 > >On 11/8/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings: > > > > >http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=aj9runQF0f_4&refer=japan > > > > http://tinyurl.com/wpvss > > > > If Pentax keeps going like this, we'll have to go back to discussing > > pictures. > > > > John > >We need Herb Chong to tell us what this ~really~ means... > ><LOL> > >cheers, >frank > > >-- >"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
