On 11/23/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could shoot PEF with a K10D and then go through the batch conversion > process to create compressed DNG files. > > Or I could shoot uncompressed DNG with the K10D... and then go through > the batch conversion process to create compressed DNG files. > > Either way involves the batch conversion process, which can be time > consuming. If the K10D shot *compressed* DNG then I'd be able to skip > the entire batch process. This is what I was hoping for.
My current workflow uses the Adobe DNG converter to copy the PEF files off the camera card, and compress them on-the-fly. So I save a copying step in there. I'm wondering if there's a reason why I should keep the original PEF files (*istDS2) around. I've been going back later, and copying them off the card, usually while the computer is doing something else, like generating PSD files out of Camera Raw. -Mat -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
