Part of the problem there is that Jeep should never have been a brand in 
the first place. In fact it originated as a WW1 term for an unproven 
vehicle, although how it came to be applied to the 1/4 ton 4x4 truck of 
WW2 is speculation.

Of course, the exact same thing has happened with Hummer (which 
originated as military slang for a HMMWV).

-Adam


Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I agree. Substitutions are a problem in modern society. As are brand  
> impeachments. I worked on Jeep advertising, and one of our major  
> problems was that "Jeep" had become a generic name for 4x4 SUVs. This  
> was particularly true in Europe. We even did an advertising campaign  
> aimed specifically at correcting this. It was for Europe and South  
> America only. Each had a picture of the three Jeep models was  
> pictured at an archetypical American location. The headlines read  
> something like: "There's only one Grand Canyon. There's only one Jeep.
> Paul
> On Nov 24, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
> 
>> On Nov 24, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>> No, it's not.  A Coke is NOT Pepsi.  They are different formulas
>>> and taste
>>> different.  When I order a Coke, I don't want a Pepsi.  The
>>> converse is
>>> also true. Try telling Coke that it's the same as Pepsi.  If you
>>> tell me
>>> Coke, I expect Coke, not Pepsi.
>>>
>>> If you want to argue minutia, make a good solid argument, not this
>>> specious
>>> soft drink crap.  Next you'll be telling us that a 7-up is the same
>>> as a
>>> Sprite, and that Budweiser is a Corona, and a Land Rover is a Jeep
>>> (Don't
>>> let Daimler-Chrysler catch you ... they are very protective of their
>>> trademark name).
>> What makes me royally mad is to ask for butter in a restaurant and be
>> brought margerine.  They are not the same, no matter how many blank-
>> faced young waitresses try to convince me otherwise. Similarly, if I
>> ask for cream for my coffee, I mean something that came from a cow,
>> not some partially-hydrogenated soybean oil crapola.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to