What you're missing is that noise reduction costs more detail than noise 
does.

-Adam


Tom C wrote:
> I'm not arguing that though. :-)
> 
> To me noise and loss of detail wind up being essentially two kinds of the 
> same thing, loss of resolution and clarity.
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
>> From: "Perry Pellechia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: PESO; A smoke on the sidewalk
>> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:31:57 -0500
>>
>> Pentax could have made iso 1600 "cleaner" by imposing more aggressive
>> noise reduction.  However, that would have been at the expense of
>> detail and I think they make the correct choice.
>>
>> On 12/21/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I won't argue that 1st point... I was objecting to the statement that 
>> Pentax
>>> "decided not to obliterate all the noise and allow some character to 
>> show".
>>> I'm sure they wanted it as noise-free as possible.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom C.
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: PESO; A smoke on the sidewalk
>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:43:52 -0500
>>>>
>>>> But you're going to have noise at 1600 regardless. So if you can make
>>>> it look more like grain than noise, it's a plus. However, that being
>>>> said, the K10 is no noisier at 1600 than the D, but the look is a bit
>>>> nicer. Quite an achievement, I'd say.
>>>> Paul
>>>> On Dec 21, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Tom C wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes very nice to leave crap lying around in the image... Thanks
>>>>> Pentax,
>>>>> you're managing to reverse 100 years of technology advancements in
>>>>> the field
>>>>> of photography.  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Grain has never been the overwhelming desire in the manufacture of
>>>>> film or
>>>>> printing of images except in those relatively rare cases where it's
>>>>> used to
>>>>> an artistic advantage.  Other than that it's reduction has been the
>>>>> holy
>>>>> grail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Come on Shel...
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom C.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Subject: RE: PESO; A smoke on the sidewalk
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:36:33 -0800
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, almost forgot .... I really like the grain on this one.  Very
>>>>>> nice the
>>>>>> way Pentax has decided not to obliterate all the noise and allow 
>> some
>>>>>> character to show in the images.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Original Message]
>>>>>>> From: Paul Stenquist
>>>>>>> K10D, DA 50-200 at 200mm. I set my K10D at f6.3, 1/200th. Put the
>>>>>>> camera in TAV mode and let it select the sensitivity. This shot
>>>>>>> came in
>>>>>>> at ISO 1600. Converted to BW in the channel mixture. I like this
>>>>>>> shooting mode. Would not have wanted to think about ISO when I
>>>>>>> pulled
>>>>>>> the trigger on this. But knew what kind of shutter speed and
>>>>>>> aperture I
>>>>>>> wanted. Just an average shot of someone on the street, but a good
>>>>>>> experiment in regard to how I want to work with this camera in 
>> these
>>>>>>> kinds of situations.
>>>>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5358043
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>
>> --
>> <---------------------------------------------------->
>> Perry Pellechia
>>
>> Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
>> <---------------------------------------------------->
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to