John Sessoms wrote: >> From: >> Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> In this case, I am a bit suspicious. The climatologists have way too >> much incentive to find that 'The Sky Is Falling!' If it is, they are >> terribly important people and we must pay absolute attention to >> everything they say. If it isn't, then their work is just another >> 'ho-hum' fact in the ebb and flow of our planet. > The problem I have is it looks to me like the most vocal critics of > global warming are themselves politically and financially motivated by > who is paying for their research. I don't know of any scientist global > warming critic who doesn't have some kind of ties to major industries > who stand to have to spend some money if action is taken to reduce our > effect on the environment. > > As far as I can tell, all of the independents either see global warming > as a problem or a potential problem. It's not a question of whether > we're damaging our environment, but how soon that damage will become so > severe it will affect our chances of survival. And what sacrifice is > required, and who will make that sacrifice to prevent that day from > coming. Finally whether it is already too late or not. >
Actually, there's at least one. One of the founders of Greenpeace publicly split with Greenpeace a few years ago over the issue of Global Warming along with Greenpeace's increasing Luddite tendencies. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
