I should rephrase that, the amount of overcoverage needed for AS is small relative to the size of the image circle or diagonal on a FF sensor.
jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 8:24 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) the magnitude of the image correction lateral movement needed is very small relative to the size of the image circle "overcoverage" needed. I doubt many high quality pentax lenses dont already have the necessary, albeit small, "overcoverage" to do the job. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 8:06 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) >I dont believe that FF digital precludes > body integrated image stabilization. It will if the usable image circle isn't big enough to cover the sensor deflection. Offhand, what is the usable size of the image circle on the average Pentax lens? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
