You really missed the entire point of my post, It was in reference to a FF camera,and that a 43mm on FF would be same as 28mmDA lens on aps. I dont need to buy or use a pentax DSLR to know that, and you obviously dont know what the hell you are reading, because a 43mm would not be too long on FF sensor, it would be same thing as the DA28mm/2.0 you want on APS. Duh. Learn how to read the entire thread before you just throw in your stupid remarks that dont even make any sense ( a 35mm f.l. aint close to 28mm on any camera). jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 9:02 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: More rumors ... (and happy New Year) Ah, my mail filters were disabled for a few hours during a system cleanup and this nonsense was received... On Jan 1, 2007, at 10:04 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > So you want a fast normal APS lens? (28/2DA)? > On FF, you can get a killer 50mm F1.4 > for much less money thats twice as fast. > Hell, how much are the 43mm/1.9 FF lenses going for compared to the > DA28mm/2? the 43mm/1.9 FF lens on FF would most likely be way better > overall performance than the 28mm/2DA on digital APS I would think for > several reasons... jco - There is no such lens as a "DA 28mm f/2 Limited". It's a lens I would like to see produced as it would suit my needs and cameras well. - The FA35/2 AL is a perfect fast 'normal' for the 16x24 format and is less expensive than the FA43. The FA43 is too long for what I want. 28mm is a 'wide normal' for the DSLR format and I would like a lens in that focal length. - "be way better overall performance" ... Since you have zero experience with any Pentax DSLR you are just making cold air hot as usual. My email filters are now restored to operation. Bye. G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
