I wasnt "misinformed", I was
just stating the obvious, and
thats that a 43mm/1.9 on FF would
be better than a 28mm/2 on APS
most likely. How can you argue
with that simple concept or opinion?
And where's the " misinformed opinion"
part you are referring to? 
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 9:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: More rumors ... (and happy New Year)


Ah, the beginning of a flame war. No need to disparage JCO here. He  
was merely stating an opinion, however misinformed it might be. Who  
was it who just said:

"It's sad to see this whole stupid "FF vs APS-C" horsepucky again be a
bazillion message thread. Two misnomers make a religious battle it
seems. I'll just take pictures and to hell with trying to discuss it."

Do as I say, not as I do?
Paul

On Jan 1, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

> Ah, my mail filters were disabled for a few hours during a system 
> cleanup and this nonsense was received...
>
> On Jan 1, 2007, at 10:04 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>> So you want a fast normal APS lens? (28/2DA)?
>> On FF, you can get a killer 50mm F1.4
>> for much less money thats twice as fast.
>> Hell, how much are the 43mm/1.9 FF lenses going for compared to the 
>> DA28mm/2? the 43mm/1.9 FF lens on FF would most likely be way better 
>> overall performance than the 28mm/2DA on digital APS I would think 
>> for several reasons... jco
>
> - There is no such lens as a "DA 28mm f/2 Limited". It's a lens I 
> would like to see produced as it would suit my needs and cameras well.
>
> - The FA35/2 AL is a perfect fast 'normal' for the 16x24 format and is

> less expensive than the FA43. The FA43 is too long for what I want. 
> 28mm is a 'wide normal' for the DSLR format and I would like a lens in

> that focal length.
>
> - "be way better overall performance" ... Since you have zero 
> experience with any Pentax DSLR you are just making cold air hot as 
> usual.
>
> My email filters are now restored to operation. Bye.
>
> G
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to