Yeah, an Imacon Flextight would be wonderful. But $5000 for the cheapest one puts it well out of my budget, never mind the time it takes to use it.
Results I've seen from the Epson V700 are pretty good. $500 is a lot closer to affordable... Godfrey On Jan 1, 2007, at 8:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > For several years, I scanned all my 6x7 transparencies and negs on an > Epson 3200. The results were nice. I sold quite a few as stock and > many to magazines. When I went to visit my friend the other day, he > asked me to bring some transparencies that I had confidence in > regarding sharpness and exposure. I brought a few car shots from one > of my magazine articles. He scanned them on an Imacon. Wow. I was > impressed. I printed one on the 2400 when I got home. An amazing > difference. Not just in sharpness or detail resolution, but shadow > detail and color gradation as well. Now I just have to find a > benefactor to buy me an Imacon. When I have time, I'll prepare a 100% > crop comparison, since I still have my original scans. > Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
