On Jan 1, 2007, at 6:43 PM, K.Takeshita wrote: > I did not think it was directed to anyone specific :-).
I'm glad for that. > But by calling a thread stupid, I just felt that some people might > have been > offended and did not think there was any need to stir up a pod > which was > relatively calm. That's all. Well, the intent was to say "I want no further participation in this BS". I only posted it since I had been involved at the beginning of the thread, felt everything that needed to be said was said, and thought my message was brief and too the point, stated my opinion clearly. I'm very calm here. Just scanning all those 645 negatives I made, one at a time ... Tedious. I want them into the digital domain so I can work on rendering a few of them and can archive them properly. Obscanning: I love the look of the images, but quite frankly the K10D does better at detail resolution and tonality than 645 format film and an Epson 2450 scanner. I need a better scanner, I guess. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
