Half of your examples are grossly underexposed. I'm guessing those are the digital samples. That makes the comparison irrelevant, because underexposure causes image degradation. Paul On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
> To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of choosing > the right > gear for the job. > Well, I know Luminous Landscape says a Canon 1Ds does better than a > scan > from a Pentax 6x7. > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml > > But paper is patient. So are HTML-files. > But what can we do, really? > > Have any of you guys done group-portraits with a digital camera - > APS or > Full Frame? > If you have such group portraits, showing 20-30 people, I'd love to > see one > face croped out of it. > A crop showing 5-10% of the total frame area. > Just to see if you can do this better than me. > > So, for staters I made a small comparison here: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594491741789/ > > Comments are most welcome > Regards > Jens Bladt > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: > 01/20/2007 > 22:31 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
