No, not really. That's a digital myth. Underexposure is the enemy of good digital photography On Jan 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
> No, not really. Digital images of this sort must be underexposed, > in order > to avoid burned out highlights, to which thery are more prone than > film > images. > regards > > Jens Bladt > Nytarkort / Greeting Card: > http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html > > http://www.jensbladt.dk > +45 56 63 77 11 > +45 23 43 85 77 > Skype: jensbladt248 > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne > af Paul > Stenquist > Sendt: 21. januar 2007 20:07 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: Re: Film vs. Digital - not a religion > > > Half of your examples are grossly underexposed. I'm guessing those > are the digital samples. That makes the comparison irrelevant, > because underexposure causes image degradation. > Paul > On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Jens Bladt wrote: > >> To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of choosing >> the right >> gear for the job. >> Well, I know Luminous Landscape says a Canon 1Ds does better than a >> scan >> from a Pentax 6x7. >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml >> >> But paper is patient. So are HTML-files. >> But what can we do, really? >> >> Have any of you guys done group-portraits with a digital camera - >> APS or >> Full Frame? >> If you have such group portraits, showing 20-30 people, I'd love to >> see one >> face croped out of it. >> A crop showing 5-10% of the total frame area. >> Just to see if you can do this better than me. >> >> So, for staters I made a small comparison here: >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594491741789/ >> >> Comments are most welcome >> Regards >> Jens Bladt >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: >> 01/20/2007 >> 22:31 >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: > 01/20/2007 > 22:31 > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: > 01/20/2007 > 22:31 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
